Poor Republican

Poor Republican

&
 

Nov 20 2008

Who are Republicans anyway?

Published by csc5502 at 2:32 pm under Politics Edit This

Well, it depends on who you ask, but I refer to the “right wing” that the media always labels Conservative Republicans.  Has anyone ever noticed that the media rarely uses the term “left wing” when referring to Democrats?  There are Republicans who clearly are only in the party to fool certain voters with the (R) in front of their name, so I don’t count them in my definition.

A real Republican believes in Conservative values, starting with the Constitution.  Often described as “strict constructionists,” we believe, oddly, that the Constitution means what it actually says it does.  Liberals like to call it a “living document,” which is liberal-speak for “we can make it say whatever we want it to say.”  And they don’t only do it with the Constitution.  They also like to pretend they’re Catholic while supporting gay marriage and abortion.  Apparently Catholic teachings are “living” also.  It allows a liberal to practice moral ambiguity while claiming to adhere to the rules.  A conservative believes that rules are rules.

Liberals like to claim that the Founding Fathers never anticipated (insert liberal cause here), and therefore the Constitution has to be “interpreted” in a more modern light.  This is patently false.  If the Constitution were meant to be redefined any time it was considered inconvenient, there would be no amendment process.  The fact that it can be amended through a very long and complicated process means two things.  One, it means that the document is supposed to be changed literally, not interpretively.  Two, it means that the process is supposed to be hard, to prevent the whim of a majority from altering the founding document of this country.  In other words, it’s not supposed to be changed by a couple of unelected judges.  Can you say Roe v. Wade?  Imagine if every defendant could go into criminal court and argue that a law is outdated or otherwise unfair to him and have a chance the judge would simply change it?  Or what if we could argue that anti-lynching laws were living documents?  Would liberals tolerate such loose definitions when the laws involve causes they support?

A Republican believes in the rule as written.  Liberals believe the rules mean whatever they want them to mean whenever the situation calls for a different interpretation.  Does that mean a Republican is perfect?  Of course not.  Republicans break laws, cheat on their spouses, etc. just like anyone else.  We’re human beings.  The difference is that a Republican knows a rule is being broken and most of the time will resign, take responsibility and pay the price.  Other Republicans will denounce the offender and demand accountability.  A Democrat will deny, claim the rule is unfair, and refuse to accept responsibility.  And other Democrats will rally around and help.

Basically, a Conservative Republican believes that there is right and wrong, that rules are rules, and that the country is not better off chasing “change” and “progress” for the sake of themselves.  We don’t want to fix what isn’t broken.  Liberal Democrats believe there is no right or wrong (”don’t be judgmental”), rules are NOT rules (living documents) and the country should always be making progress (they like to call themselves “progressives”) regardless of the direction.  And they are willing to break anything and everything so they can be the ones to “fix” things.

Starting on January 21, 2009, you will see exactly what I mean.

Possibly-related Articles:                                        (auto-generated)

4 Responses to “Who are Republicans anyway?”

  1. davidrudeon 20 Nov 2008 at 2:56 pm edit this

    Man there are alot of Republicans on this thing….

  2. rex connelyon 20 Nov 2008 at 3:13 pm edit this

    How do you explain the “unitary executive” means of governance under George W. Bush, then? Or the amount of Republican senators and representatives and their buddies that have been convicted and indicted in the last three years alone?\

    —csc5502 says: If there was such a thing as “unitary executive” government, Bush could’ve gotten more judges appointed. He could’ve reformed Social Security. There would be no civil court nonsense with the Gitmo terrorists. Since none of that happened, I guess government wasn’t so unitary after all, huh? Also, indictments and convictions aren’t the same, and for those convicted I say hand them what they deserve. See? That’s what a Republican does. When’s the last time a Democrat called out another Democrat for impropriety?

  3. analyzethison 20 Nov 2008 at 5:47 pm edit this

    Doesn’t Bush and Cheney consider themselves conservative Republicans? Do they really believe in “right and wrong and rules are rules. Yeah… OK…therfore it is safe to say that Americans are suffering more than ever before because the conservative Republicans are the only Americans who understand and honor the laws of the Constitution. Myself and 88% more Americans beg to differ.

    —-csc5502 says: What they consider themselves to be and what they are do not constitute the same thing. And where do you get your percentage? Daily Kos? Bush’s approval rating got down to the 20s…that mean most REPUBLICANS disapproved of him too. Do you really think we disapprove for the same reasons you do? We coined the term RINO for people like Bush. Look it up.

  4. L.M.on 20 Nov 2008 at 7:09 pm edit this

    Only three days old and already making good “enemies.” Good for you.

    The way you talk, I’m surprised you’re not really Catholic! I have to heartily agree that rules are rules! When will you get around to teaching us to live with family members who are not Republican? :)

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

Some Today.com contributors may have received a fee or a promotional product or service from a manufacturer for promotional consideration, while others receive no consideration at all. Each contributor is responsible for disclosing any such promotional consideration.